[業界]任天堂的霸氣:新主機是玩遊戲，不是畫面

eilot

Developers claim Wii U weaker than PS3, 360. Nintendo says focus on “play,” not “numbers.”

Six years after Wii, Nintendo's ready to enter the HD console race, but the Wii U may not even be able to keep up with the Xbox 360 or PlayStation 3.

The PlayStation 4 may block the usage of used games and the Xbox 720 may make the jump to using Blu-ray discs. We don’t know. All the rumors and speculation about Orbis and Durango are just that: rumors and speculation. What we can be sure of is that both machines will feature significant graphical upgrades over the Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3. Nintendo’s next machine though, the Wii U, may not be able to make the same claim. According to some developers, Nintendo’s first HD console can’t output graphics that are even on par with Microsoft and Sony’s current machines.

Developers speaking with GamesIndustry International on Monday had more than a few disparaging comments in store for Nintendo’s upcoming tablet-controlled console. “It’s not up to same level as the PS3 or the 360. The graphics are just not as powerful,” said one source.

A representative of Nintendo of America neither confirmed nor denied the report for Digital Trends. “We do not focus on technology specs. We understand that people like to dissect graphics and processing power, but the experience of playing will always be more important than raw numbers.”

Small comfort to developers that must develop for multiple platforms for their games to be commercially viable.

Another source cited as a “developer at a major company” supported the first source’s claim. “Yeah, that’s true. It doesn’t produce graphics as well as the PS3 or the 360. There aren’t as many shaders, it’s not as capable,” said the source. It isn’t all bad news though. “Some things are better, mostly as a result of it being a more modern design. But overall the Wii U just can’t quite keep up.”

Nintendo has yet to disclose just what the Wii U is and isn’t capable of. The majority of games already announced for the device are PS3 and 360 games though, including Ninja Gaiden 3, Batman: Arkham City, and unreleased titles like Darksiders II and Aliens: Colonial Marines. Based on these developers’ comments though, those titles may not look quite as nice as they do on competing machines.

It’s possible that the Wii U’s poor graphical prowess is a concession made for its unique controller. The tablet isn’t just a control interface, it’s been positioned as an independent play screen, letting the player enjoy a game on the controller rather than a television the Wii U’s hooked up to. If Nintendo has devoted more of the device’s resources to accommodating that process rather than investing in a beefier GPU, that could explain what developers are reporting.

轉自http://www.digitaltrends.com/gam ... n-play-not-numbers/

什麼叫霸氣
雖然任天堂新機畫面、系統都不如PS3和360
但我出的是好遊戲，畫面是什麼根本是空談

bbsbbsb

第三方遊戲賣不出去是大問題啊, 你可以賣遊戲性, 但不能不讓別人賣畫面啊

yybbffeedd

问题是有什么很出彩的游戏吗。。。

nds都快到死期了，和gba根本没法比啊，好游戏的产量上

JWallace

老任向来喜欢靠卖主机赚钱的，所以一直不肯把配置搞上去

说谎的阿道

老任第一方太强。。
所以底气十足。。

seventhluna

GB时代，记得SEGA有款机子GG，彩屏（GB还黑白的呢），结果由于其庞大的耗电量推出了掌机舞台，任天堂借此说道他们当时并不是没有彩屏技术，但他们清楚对于玩家来说真正重要的是什么，之后的NDS由于其强大的创意和游戏性，仍然牢牢稳坐掌机大部分江山，任天堂所做的不是如何让游戏更华丽，而是如何让游戏更好玩，这也是任天堂单单一个游戏行业的厂商竟可以股价直逼日本汽车龙头丰田的原因之一，其发展至今不无其道理

冥虹

个人觉得画面固然不错，但游戏可玩性才是最主要的

Shak0501

看到這則..第三方會淚目吧~?

guidiandee

老任压榨软件开发商是出了名的黑，开发商都知道。现在老任自己缺少先进的硬件开发技术，没资金开发大量的游戏，只能靠其他游戏厂商支持。游戏厂商都是有奶就是娘的，哪个主机开发游戏成本低，难度容易，硬件销量好，游戏就会出在哪个主机上。现在日本游戏业日薄西山，不开拓其他国家市场就很难发展了。说白了就是老任后劲不足，看看3DS那落后的硬件技术和那大缩水的价格吧，光靠游戏性的时代早就过去了，老任说这话自我安慰罢。再说好玩的游戏也可以出到其他主机上啊，3方大战结果一切都很难说

solitaryx

老任有自己的卖座游戏系列，所以它可以说不在乎画面，但最终还是看第三方支持谁
如果微软参战掌机，那老任不改变策略就杯具了

host0201

就我個人來看
遊戲性還是第一
畫面只要中等即可
不需要3D

white_hot

先建立在这条消息属实的基础上再讨论吧。
最近还有一个消息，PS4性能可能不如WIIU，由此我们可以得到三段式推论PS3>PS4。

陈金一

这个虽然我也认同游戏艺术论。。。但是没有好的画面的游戏机，游戏性终究还是有极限的~~Wii就是一个活生生的例子。。。游戏素质一塌糊涂。。。终究只是做一些简单上手娱乐大众的东西罢了。。。和我看不上的APPLE上的游戏一样。。。

遊戲性? 等其他廠商趕快出些支援的遊戲比較實在
當年就是體感的WII 所以才受到大家的喜愛
但是後來都走向M$的KINAT 完法
看WII-U能怎麼辦吧

stmule

这个时代，如果不信技术力之神的话会遭天谴的恩